Life history of Paulo friere
Paulo Freire was born on September
19, 1921 at Recife in Brazil in a catholic Christian family. Because of the
economic crisis in the family his family shifted to a city called Jab octao
during 1928 to 1932. There freire continued his secondary education. His
education was interrupted many time because of the poor economics condition of
the family. Freire worked as a teacher in the middle schools of Brazil, in 1944
he married Eliza Maria oliverra, an elementary school teacher, for some years
till 1954, he worked as the Head of the cultural Department of social service
organization for Industries he worked as part – time teacher in Racife
University. He work for the awareness of the oppressed, illiterate people of Brazil.
His two books ‘pedagogy of the oppressed’ and ‘cultural action for freedom’ are
famous. In these two books he has expressed his educational philosophy and
methods for educating the oppressed people.
Paulo Freire’s aim of education
Paulo Freire’s concept of education
is called “conscientization”. Brazil is a developing country. In Brazil many
people are oppressed. Freire’s ideas are for imparting education to these
people. In this book “Pedagogy of the oppressed”, he has published his concepts
of education.
Education is a continuous process,
and it changes very often. Raising the consciousness of the oppressed and the
down-trodden is the aim of education.
Education is an instrument for
social change. We must create the following qualities among the people who are
educationally oppressed.
Ø
Praxis or reflection and action.
Ø
Freedom
Ø
Autonomy
Ø
Cultural action for freedom
According to Freire “Illiteracy is a product of oppression” so education
must create the power of reasoning and freedom among people.
The Pedagogy of the Oppressed
It is important for us to know the
meaning of terms expressed by Friere so as to understand his view of education.
- Pedagogy is the study of teaching methods. Oppressed are those people who are treated in a cruel and unfair way and not given the same freedom and rights as others.
- Education should make the students reflect upon and analyze the world in which one lives so that one could reform it. He does not believe that lived situation consists only of a sample awareness of reality, but the individual has a historical need to fight against the status that dwells within him.
- One has to create one’s own words, words that allow one to become aware of reality in order to fight for their own emancipation.
- The inner drive to become free from oppression emerges from the interior of the consciousness as a result of cognitive development. Through systematic study one learns to fight for the end of oppression.
“Banking” concept of education
- ‘Banking’ means education in which passive learners have pre-selected knowledge deposited in their minds. ‘bank’ concept of education is an instrument of oppression for Freire. In his time there was excessive use of lecturing and memorizing with little analysis of the importance of what is being memorized.
- The teacher is the depositor and the knowledge is deposited on a daily basis. Such method tries to convince the minds, of students so that they will adapt better to actual situations only to be oppressed more.
Dialogue
- He proposes dialogue to be established between the teacher and student because man creates himself through words, actions and reflections and not in silence. Therefore dialogue is the key element in learning.
- Dialogue is possible only when I respect the other person. Dialogue with community is importance too. He stresses the need to know and understand the context of the students namely where they come from and their way of thinking, to avoid de-contextualizing their work.
- Therefore the teaching should be part of their reality so that it does not become a mechanistic act. This background awareness creates knowledge and therefore one need not look out for opportunities and topics for study. Topics for learning could be found in the reality that surrounds the individual.
THEORY OF PAULO FRIERE
Theory of Value
Education should raise the awareness
of the students so that they become subject, rather than objects, of the world.
This is done by teaching students to think democratically and to continually
question and make meaning from everything they learn.
Theory of Knowledge
Freire discusses two types of
knowledge, unconscious, sometimes practical knowledge and critical, reflective
or their knowledge. Beliefs are shaped into knowledge by discussion and
critical reflection.
Theory of Human Nature
The ability of humans to plan and
shape the world for their future needs is what separates man from animals. The
oppressed majority must be taught to imagine a better way so that they can
shape their future and thereby become more human.
Theory of Learning
Freire talks about the fallacy of
looking at the education system like a bank, a large repository where students
come to with draw the knowledge they need for life. Knowledge is not a set
commodity that is passed from the teachers to the students. Students must
construct knowledge from knowledge they already possess. Teachers must learn
how the students understand the world so that the teacher understands how the
student can learn.
Theory of Transmission
Teaching is a political process. It
must be a democratic process to avoid teaching authority dependence. The
teacher must learn about (and from) the student so that knowledge can be
constructed in ways that are meaningful to the student. The teachers must
become learners and the learns must become teachers.
Theory of Society
Freire challenge the conventional
assumptions that there is equal opportunity in a democratic society. He
asserts, often, that education is a political process. Schools become tools
that are used by parents, business and the community to impose their values and
beliefs. While no intentional harm is intended, this process often results in
the oppression of less privileged persons.
Theory of Opportunity
Freire’s entire education career is
based on his desire to provide greater opportunity for the poor and oppressed
people of the world.
Theory of Consensus
Disagreement is normal and something
to expect. Disagreement can be an impetus to reflection and a source of growth.
The problem that Freire wants to address is when opinions and disagreements are
suppressed in the name of control and authority.
Merits
Ø
It is to create awareness among the oppressed
people.
Ø
It is used to make the people to relies
difference in the social economic condition.
Ø
It is usually written within a more
conversational or accessible framework.
Demerits
Ø
Even though his approach is still
curriculum-based and entail transforming settings into a particular type of
pedagogical space.
Ø
The practice of Friere education can involve
smuggling in all of ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment